Home About Us Cover Story Selected Articles
Editorials 编辑室 > An $11.6 billion Budget for Education in 2013
2013年116亿元的年度教育开支
An $11.6 billion Budget for Education in 2013
By Poon Sing Wah
Published: EduNation, Issue 3, May-Jun 2013

In Singapore, the Ministry of Education (MOE) is second only to the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) in terms of annual government expenditure. For the Financial Year (FY) 2013, MOE has been allocated $11.635 billion, a mere $700 million less than MINDEF, which was allocated $12.335 billion. This figure also exceeded the $11.27613 billion MINDEF totalled in actual expenditure in FY 2011, and is the biggest ever sum given to education, 10.5 per cent higher than the $10.53 billion spent in the last financial year.

The strength of a country depends not only on military might; it hinges upon education, on producing skilled, independent, creative and innovative citizens to defend the country. In the past decade, the Singapore government has almost doubled its expenditure on education. In 2003, the education budget was $6.5 billion. In 2013, this figure is $11.6 billion, an increase of 78 per cent.

A financial injection of this magnitude directly benefits our students. All 500,000 of them have seen increasing amounts of government subsidy over the years. This financial year, their subsidies are projected to be, per student: $8,162 at the primary level; $10,845 at the secondary level; $13,888 at the junior college level; $11,966 for students in institutes of technical education; $14,804 for students in polytechnics; and $21,815 for undergraduates studying in publicly-funded universities.

Of the allocated $11.635 billion, $3.27 billion will be spent on our publicly-funded universities, an increase of $630 million (or 24 per cent) over last year’s $2.64 billion. This increase will largely go towards subsidising the increase in undergraduates this year, as well as overheads for research initiatives. The number of undergraduates this year is expected to be 73,600, an increase of 1,700 over last year.

The publicly-funded universities are the four autonomous universities: the National University of Singapore; the Nanyang Technological University; the Singapore Management University; and the Singapore University of Technology and Design, as well as the most recent institution to be upgraded to university status, the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT).

In order to raise the university cohort participation rate from the current 27 per cent to the goal of 40 per cent by 2020 (which means an increase to 16,000 Singaporean undergraduates per cohort), the government has not only increased the number of places in the four autonomous universities and SIT, but it will also support full-time courses at SIM University (UniSIM). Even though UniSIM remains a private university, any student who enrols in its full-time programme will be entitled to the same amount of subsidy as is given to students from the other publicly-funded universities. As the number of undergraduates increases year on year, the government expenditure in this area is expected to rise in tandem.

The planned growth in the number of university graduates is in line with the government’s long-term development blueprint.

On 29 January 2013, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean together with six other Members of Parliament unveiled the details of the Population White Paper at a press conference. One area the government is set to work on is increasing the number of PMET (Professional, Managerial, Executive and Technical) workers.

As the workforce becomes increasingly qualified it is predicted that by 2030 two thirds of adult Singaporeans (1.25 million people) will hold PMET jobs. This figure is an increase of 400,000 from the current number of 850,000, a 47 per cent growth. On the other hand, the number in non-PMET jobs is expected to fall by 24 per cent to 650,000 compared to the 850,000 today. We can only fulfil these predictions if we increase the number of graduates.

A paragraph in the Population White Paper reads: “Many Asian cities are modernising rapidly, and catching up on us. Singapore must continue to develop and upgrade to remain a key node in the network of global cities, a vibrant place where jobs and opportunities are created. Our economy must stay ahead of other Asian cities, so that we can provide them with the high-end goods and services that they need but are not yet able to produce themselves.”

Singapore can only remain competitive if we have a high quality workforce.

Our businesses will need a workforce with the full range of skills, backgrounds and experiences that can kick-start high value-added merging sectors, and understand regional and international markets. Such a workforce can only be built by raising the educational level and quality of Singaporeans.

The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) conducted in 2011 published the results in Maths and Science of Grade 4 and Grade 8 students (i.e. Secondary 2) from 50 and 42 countries and economies respectively. Singapore ranked first in Primary 4 Maths and Secondary 2 Science, and second in Primary 4 Science and Secondary 2 Maths, behind Korea.

The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) conducted in 2011 saw participation from Grade 4 students from 45 countries and economies. Singaporean students came in fourth. For countries for which the medium of examination is English, the mean score of Singaporean students was the highest, coming in ahead of Northern Ireland and the United States.

China did not take part in either assessment.

On 13 March 2013 when Minister for Education Heng Swee Keat spoke at the Committee of Supply Debate he referred to these international benchmarking studies. Singapore has achieved commendable results, even more so as less than four per cent of students fell below the “low” benchmark of competence across all grades and subjects. This is significantly better than what was achieved a decade ago, and far better than the international average of 12 to 27 per cent.

However, Mr Heng was still concerned about this small percentage of students who fell into the “low ability” group.

“One to four per cent is still too many for us,” he said, and pledged to do better. He went on to outline a set of measures to level-up our weaker students and those who come from disadvantaged backgrounds. These policies will comprehensively improve the chances for these children in a Master Plan of “Hope and Opportunity” that will help every child to succeed and leave no child left behind. These measures will kick in at the earliest levels, so no Singaporean child will lose out at the starting line. They will help every child, regardless of family background, to attend a quality kindergarten, and thereafter to build a strong foundation in the ten years of his or her primary and secondary education. This is especially important for students from disadvantaged backgrounds and for those who need more dedicated support.

“Our education system must always provide hope — and what is more, provide hope to all,” stressed Mr Heng.

These admirable policies include setting up 15 pilot kindergartens in the next three years in HDB heartlands. These kindergartens will provide a quality education that will be affordable to Singaporeans. This will give a boost to low-income families that cannot afford to send their children to a good pre-school. In the coming five years, the government will spend more than $3 billion on early childhood education.

“Parents who don’t earn a lot often neglect their child’s pre-school education. They are of the misconception that it is unimportant. Therefore we need to expand and strengthen our early childhood education in order to help the children from low-income families, and let them receive quality pre-school education,” said Mr Heng.

Additionally, more Student Care Centres will be set up in schools. These Centres will be staffed by professionals who will look after their charges while the parents are out at work. Currently, there are 80 Schools equipped with such Centres, responsible for caring for the students after classes. This number will increase in the future.

The Learning Support Programmes for English and Mathematics, which were originally put in place for Primary 1 and 2 students who start primary school with weaker foundations in literacy and numeracy, will be expanded to help students all the way up to secondary school. These supplementary classes will have no more than ten students per class to ensure that each child receives sufficient attention. To this end, MOE will recruit another 600 teachers.

Similarly, the Opportunity Fund, which provides financial subsidies for immersion programmes and necessary educational purchases, saw its budget increase by $72 million. Schools that have more students from poor families will receive more money. Each secondary school is eligible to receive up to $275,000 from the Opportunity Fund and each primary school up to $150,000, which is a 40 per cent increase. Starting from this year, needy students in polytechnics may also apply for subsidies from the Opportunity Fund should they wish to go overseas for immersion programmes. An estimated 100,000 students from less well-to-do families stand to benefit from this scheme.

“Today, around 30 per cent of our economically active adults over the age of 50 do not have anything more than a Primary School education. Many find it very hard to upgrade or retrain for better jobs. In the future MOE will aim for every student to complete his or her secondary education and ideally go on to pursue a tertiary qualification as well. It is about providing the best opportunities for every child to succeed, regardless of their background and pace of development. Every child has the potential and power to succeed in school and in life, if he or she puts in the effort. Special attention should be given to those from disadvantaged backgrounds. This is about hope,” said Mr Heng.

Mr Heng quoted one participant in the current Singapore Conversation who said, “We need to groom Singaporeans who are confident yet humble and generous in heart; always seeking to learn and improve; dignified and respectful but also assertive in voicing their concerns in a sensible way.”

For those concerned about Singapore education, we will have to wait and see whether this can now happen.

Translated by: Lee Xiao Wen
 


《新学》关心教育 > 2013年116亿元的年度教育开支
2013年116亿元的年度教育开支
文:潘星华
刊载:《新学》, 第3期,2013年5月-6月
在新加坡,教育部一向是仅次于国防部获得政府最高拨款的政府部门。2013财政年度,教育部获得116亿35000万元的拨款,仅比国防部的123亿3500万元少7亿元,也已超过国防部在2011年112亿7613万元的实际开销。是历年来最高,也比去年105亿3000万元的预算高出10.5%。

一个国家的实力,除了要靠先进的军备武装起来,更重要的还要通过教育,培养能掌握熟练技能,同时具备独立、有想像力、创新思维能力的高素质人民保家卫国。新加坡政府在过去10年,在教育上面的投资几乎翻了一倍。2003年的教育投资是65亿元,2013年是116亿元,增加了78%。

这样的一笔巨额拨款,直接让学生受益。新加坡接近50万名学生,政府在他们身上的投资,年年增加。2013年是这样的:小学生每人8162元,中学生每人1万零845元,初级学院生(高中生)每人1万3888元,工艺教育学院生每人1万1966元,理工学院生每人1万4804元,大学生每人2万1815元。

116亿3500万元的年度开销,有32亿7000万元用在公费大学,比去年的26亿4000万元增加了6亿3000万元(增幅24%),主要用在大学生人数的增加及研究开销。今年公费大学生人数预期是7万3600人,比去年的7万1900人增加1700人。

所谓公费大学指的是国立大学、南洋理工大学、管理大学和科技设计大学等四所自治大学和新加坡科技学院。

>为了配合公费大学生人数从现在同龄生的27% 提升到2020年40%(每年约1万6000名新生)的目标,政府除了增加这四所自治大学和新加坡科技学院的学生名额,还将支持新跃大学开办全时间课程。作为私立学府的新跃大学,凡修读该校全时间课程学生却将成为政府的公费生。由于大学生人数正在逐年增加,预期政府给大学的拨款,也会每年提升。

大学生人数全面提升,是配合政府长期的发展计划。

2013年1月29日新加坡副总理张志贤连同六位部长召开的记者会宣布《人口政策白皮书》详情。其中一项政府要努力做的是增加白领阶级的人数,“为国人制造良好的就业机会”。

政府预期2030年劳动队伍里的新加坡人有三分之二(125万人)是专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师等白领人士,人数要比目前的85万人增加40万人(增幅47%)。新加坡人不属于专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师等白领人士的人数则要从目前的85万人减至65万人(减幅24%)。只有大量增加大学生,才能达到这个目标。

《人口政策白皮书》说:“许多亚洲城市正快速地现代化,并且已经开始赶上新加坡。我们必须不断发展和提升,才能继续在全球的城市群中占有重要的一席之地,并成为一个机遇处处,生机勃勃的城市……。我们必须比其他亚洲城市更具竞争力,才能够为这些城市提供他们所需要的,却还未能自行生产的高端商品和服务。”

只有建立一支高素质的劳动队伍才能让新加坡具备竞争力。

《人口政策白皮书》说:“我国企业将需要一支拥有各种技能、背景和经验的劳动队伍,以开启高增值的新兴领域以及掌握区域和国际市场的动态。”这支劳动队伍必须通过教育,全面提升新加坡人的素质来组织。

2011年国际数学与科学趋势研究报告(Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study,简称TIMSS),分别对50个国家和地区的四年级生及42个国家和地区的八年级生(相当于本地的中二生)进行数理能力评估。新加坡学生在小四数学、中二科学的组别排名第一,在小四科学和中二数学排名第二,在韩国之后。

2011年国际阅读能力进展研究(Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, 简称PIRLS)有45个国家和地区的四年级学生参与。新加坡学生的表现排名第四。在以英语进行测试的国家和地区中,新加坡学生的平均成绩最高,排在北爱尔兰、美国之前。

中国没有参与这两项评估。

2013年3月13日教育部长王瑞杰在国会拨款委员会辩论教育部开支时提到这两项国际能力评估说,新加坡学生的成绩骄人,只有1%-4%的学生属于“低能力”组。这个成绩比10年前进步很多,也远比国际平均12%-27%是“低能力”组要好。

但是他对这属于“低能力”组的1%-4%学生,耿耿于怀。

他说:“这个1%-4% 对我们来说,还是太多了。”他誓言要做得更好。他于是展示了一套给予贫困、质差学生辅助,全面提升他们的能力,提供“希望和机会”给“人人成功,不让一人掉队”的大计。这套大计从小开始,绝不让新加坡的新生代输在起跑线上。它让家境无论贫富的孩子,都能接受高素质的幼儿教育,为之后10年的中小学教育打好基础,这对来自贫困家庭、有特别需要的孩子尤其重要。

他指出:“我们的教育系统需要给孩子希望,给所有孩子希望!”

这套洋洋大观的计划,包括在未来三年,在新加坡一般人民居住的组屋区,开办15所一般家长能负担得起的优质幼儿教育,为无法让孩子从小接受高素质幼儿教育的低收入家庭加一把劲。政府在未来五年,单是学前教育的拨款,就是30亿元。

王瑞杰说:“低收入的家长最忽略孩子的幼儿教育,以为是无关紧要(结果让孩子错过了打好基础的重要时刻)。所以我们要加大幼儿教育的力度,帮助来自贫困家庭的孩子,让他们从小就能接受高素质的幼儿教育。”

另外,让孩子放学后留校的“学生托管中心”将在更多小学设立。这个中心有专人协助为谋生奔波的家长,在还没有下班前照顾他们的孩子。目前,有80所小学开设了托管中心,负责在放学后照顾留校的学生。这样的托管中心,日后会开更多。

原本只为小一和小二英文和数学能力差的学生开办的“辅助班”,也将扩展到小学的高年级和中学去。这些辅助班 ,每班少过10名学生,能让掉队的学生获得教师更好的指导。而且这把“援手”,扶助他们长大,不离不弃,从小学到中学。为此,教育部将需要增聘600名教师。

还有,支持贫困学生到海外浸濡、开拓视野,或购买必需品津贴的进取基金(Opportunity Fund)将增加7200万元。穷苦学生多的学校可以获得更多的资助,一所中学一年的进取基金可高达27万5000元,小学可高达15万元,金额比现在多出40%。今年开始,理工学院的贫困学生也能申请进取基金出国浸濡。估计约有10万名家境欠佳的学生受益。

王瑞杰说:“新加坡劳动队伍里,有30%超过50岁的工作人士,只有小学毕业的学历。这些人很难通过培训,提升找到更好的工作。教育部的目标是让每个年轻人最少接受中学教育,之后再接受大专教育。我们认为无论孩子出身家庭的贫富或自己学习进度的快慢,都有成功的潜质和力量。只要肯努力,我们要竭尽所能,提供最好的机会,让他们在学校和人生的道路上成功。我们要特别照顾来自贫寒家庭、有特别需要的孩子,要给他们希望。”

他复述一名参加“新加坡对话”的家长的话说:“我们要培养的新生代是有自信却谦逊大气,好学不倦,不断改进自己,关心社会,能理性表达自己诉求的新加坡人。”

所有关心新加坡教育的人士,我们且拭目以待吧。

务德中学是其中一所提供数学辅助的学校。该校老师会在课堂上使用代数圆盘等教具,协助学生了解并应用抽象的代数概念。
 

» Past Issues
» Last issue
» Contents

Contact us   |   Advertise with us   |   Privacy Policy
Published by WS Education is a subsidiary of

Copyright © 2021 EduNation Co. All rights reserved.